Press "Enter" to skip to content

Bankrupts are no longer fit and proper persons in some sectors

There are more than one thousand people bankrupted in NZ every year.

I’ve been researching the life long impact that a bankruptcy imposes on people. I was looking at the application on the Financial Markets Authority website to see what was entailed in applying for a Market Services Licence under the Financial Markets Conduct Act. You actually have to declare that you are a fit and proper person by way of a checklist. One of the questions is – have you been bankrupted or entered into a creditor compromise agreement in the last 15 years.

I asked the Chartered Accountants Society what they deemed to be a fit and proper person, but they did not respond. Some regular jobs can never be entered into. Apparently one cannot obtain any insurance while bankrupted.

The Insolvency Act removed the right to be automatically discharged from bankruptcy after three years. The Official Assignee did say that there are some bankrupts who have been in bankruptcy for many years.

When I speak to lawyers and accountants about my upcoming forced bankruptcy by BNZ, they can only advise whether I meet the criteria in terms of dollar value.

Not one has had the skill to advise the actual consequences of not just a forced bankruptcy by a creditor but even when a debtor themselves files. The insolvency and trustee website does put some information out. Information that includes becoming bankrupted may affect ones banking, credit reporting, employment and privacy etc.

What they don’t say is that unpaid debt is actually deemed a crime of which there is no clean slate. If a financial hearing is requested of you by a creditor through the courts, you can actually be arrested if you don’t appear. That deems you a criminal.

So should people who are bankrupted or who even have outstanding debt, be treated by society as a criminal and also as no longer a fit and proper person as some industries already treat them. Should their right to make amends be also taken away from them.

It has been said that in NZ there is a tremendous stigma around bankrupted people. Is that an acceptable standard for the people of our country. Should our laws be changed to remove the stigma. Should our laws that take away the rights of debtors be changed. Laws like the Privacy Act, and the right to represent yourself fully in court. As a judgment debtor myself my rights to those things has been denied. Should our laws be changed so debt collectors and creditors cannot continue collecting debt for the rest of a persons life.

I cannot defend creditor claims against me in the High Court without it being made public. That defense will stay public forever. I was also surprised to find that bankruptcy annulments are also permanently made public. The earliest annulment I found on the NZ Gazette dated back to 1993. Should the name of the creditor who bankrupts a person be made public.

Should people in debt be ever allowed a second chance at life. Or should they stay branded as no longer a fit and proper person for life, and be disciminated against for life.

If you readers could change our laws around bankruptcy and insolvency, what would you change?

Lisa